Asheville’s Journalists Convicted in Controversial Case

News Summary

A recent court ruling has upheld the convictions of Asheville journalists Matilda Rae Bliss and Melissa Ann Coit for second-degree trespass. The case raises significant questions regarding press freedom and First Amendment rights. The conviction stems from their arrests while reporting on police activity during protests in December 2021. With implications for journalism and public safety, the decision has sparked widespread concern and debate about the rights of reporters in challenging situations.

Asheville’s Journalists Face Uphill Battle After Court Ruling

Asheville, North Carolina, is buzzing with conversations surrounding the recent court decision that has upheld the convictions of two local journalists, Matilda Rae Bliss and Melissa Ann Coit. The North Carolina Court of Appeals made headlines when it dismissed the appeal filed by the duo, affirming their convictions for second-degree trespass stemming from their arrests during a protest coverage.

Understanding the Backstory

Let’s rewind to that fateful December night in 2021. Bliss and Coit were dutifully reporting on police activities at Asheville’s Aston Park when they were apprehended around 10:30 PM. The park had officially closed its gates at 10:00 PM, according to Asheville’s City Code. This closing time obviously created a conflict as the journalists sought to cover breaking news surrounding protests that had commenced a week earlier, on December 19, 2021.

The Court’s Decision

The Buncombe County Superior Court jury deemed the pair guilty on June 15, 2023, leading to their appeal. However, the latest court ruling pointed out procedural deficiencies, particularly a lack of documentation that could confirm the Superior Court’s jurisdiction over the case. This ruling has sparked discussions not just about journalism, but also press freedom in Asheville and beyond.

First Amendment Concerns

Many are scratching their heads over the implications of such a ruling. With Bliss and Coit claiming their actions were necessary for gathering news, the arguments raised significant waves around First Amendment rights. Their attorneys, including local legal expert Ben Scales and Duke University School of Law’s First Amendment Clinic, emphasized that the police had effectively stifled their right to report. Interestingly, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press also stepped in as a supporter, highlighting just how far-reaching this situation may be.

The Charge of Trespassing

During the initial arrests, police had bodycam footage suggesting Bliss and Coit were causing disruptions merely by documenting the police’s actions. The authorities contended that the enforcement of a park closure policy was essential for public safety, especially as they attempted to disperse a homeless encampment at the time. The arguments put forth by the police pivot on ensuring order, while the journalists maintain they were simply doing their job by reporting crucial news events.

Next Steps for the Journalists

Despite the ruling, both Bliss and Coit have reiterated their commitment to continue contesting these charges. They view the matter as one that transcends their individual cases—one that ties directly into ongoing conversations about press freedoms in communities across the nation.

Potential Legal Loopholes

The recent court ruling has brought to light the responsibilities of defendants in maintaining a well-rounded appeal record. As outlined by Judge Jeff Carpenter, Bliss and Coit did not provide sufficient records that would allow the court to verify whether the Superior Court held proper jurisdiction in the matter.

In the midst of all this, District Attorney Todd Williams pointed out that Bliss and Coit had previously turned down a pre-trial community service resolution that could have resolved the charges without going through the legal wringer they face now. This adds another layer of interest as the case unfolds, potentially influencing how similar situations will be handled in the future.

A Broader Dialogue

The ongoing saga involving these journalists in Asheville has stirred important conversations about the freedom of the press and the rights of reporters to gather news, even in challenging circumstances. As their legal team strategizes for what’s next, many in Asheville and beyond are keenly watching how this story develops. After all, it may end up being more than just a case of trespass—it could set a vital precedent for how journalists operate in the public space, especially during moments of community tension.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

White House Restricts AP Reporters Over Gulf Naming Dispute
UNC Asheville Bulldogs Prepare to Face Gardner-Webb
Celebrating Asheville’s Heartbeat Through Local Journalism
San Francisco Chronicle Announces 2025 Internship Program

Additional Resources

• Carolina Journal: Court Dismisses Appeal from Journalists Arrested During Asheville Protest
• NC Newsline: Asheville Journalists Convicted of Trespassing for Covering Police Action at Public Park
• VOA News: Two North Carolina Reporters Found Guilty of Trespassing
• NC Newsline: City of Asheville Unsurprisingly Tries to Sanction Journalists’ Lawyer for Records Requests
• Wikipedia: Freedom of the Press